All Posts
Market InsightsPodcast Clips #133 min readOctober 2, 2026

I Wouldn't Want to Be 18 Right Now

Judd Hoffman
Judd Hoffman

CEO and Co-Founder, Ethica AI

What was the old deal?

Go to school, study a certain thing, and the job was waiting for you later.

That was it. Not a promise anyone signed, but reliable enough that it functioned as one. You could make a four-year decision at eighteen and be reasonably confident about what sat on the other side of it.

What happened to it?

It stopped being dependable, and nobody announced the change.

The arrangement held long enough that people stopped experiencing it as a bargain and started experiencing it as how the world works. Which is why its absence doesn't feel like a shifting market. It feels like something being taken away.

An eighteen-year-old now picks four years of preparation for a market nobody can describe yet. The decision still arrives on the old schedule, at the same age, with the same finality. The thing it's preparing for won't sit still long enough to be aimed at.

And the advice on offer hasn't caught up either. Most of it was built for the old deal and gets handed down by people who got to rely on it.

So is it just worse?

No, and that's the part that's easy to skip past.

A path that guarantees a job also tells you who you're allowed to become. The guarantee was never free. It bought certainty with a narrower set of options, and plenty of people took a deal that fit them badly because the deal was sitting right there and the alternative was uncharted.

Losing that guarantee is frightening. It's also genuinely open in a way the old arrangement never was, and that openness is worth something to people the old version would have quietly sorted into the wrong life.

Does anyone actually know how this plays out?

No. Not the people building the tools, not the people advising eighteen-year-olds, and not the schools selling the four years.

That sounds like a bleak thing to say and it isn't meant to be. An honest "nobody knows" is more useful than a confident answer that turns out to be built on the old deal, because at least you can plan around uncertainty you've been told about.

Which reading is right, then?

Both. That's not a hedge.

Scary and incredibly exciting are two accurate descriptions of the same situation, and anyone selling only one of them is selling something. The same tension runs inside companies right now, where the honest position is that nobody knows how this develops and the work continues anyway.

We knew, once. We don't know that now.

Quick Takes

What changed about choosing a career?

The guarantee did. Study a specific thing and a specific job was waiting on the other side. That arrangement held long enough to feel like a law rather than a bargain, and it no longer reliably holds.

Why is that harder than it sounds?

Because an 18-year-old is being asked to pick four years of preparation for a market nobody can describe yet. The decision arrives on the old timetable while the thing it's preparing for keeps moving.

Is there an upside to losing the predictable path?

Genuinely, yes. A path that guarantees a job also constrains what you're allowed to become. Scary and exciting aren't in tension here, they're two accurate readings of the same open situation.

Sources

  1. Betting on Things We Don't Know: The same uncertainty seen from the other end, by someone running a company inside it.
  2. AI Doesn't Get a Vote: On which parts of skilled work hold their value as the tooling shifts underneath.

Full Transcript

Quite frankly, I would not want to be 18 right now. Trying to figure out what I'm doing in four years.

I knew when I was 18, if I go to school and study a certain thing, that job was waiting for me later.

We don't know that now. It's scary but incredibly exciting at the same time.

Judd Hoffman

Judd D. Hoffman

CEO and Co-Founder, Ethica AI

Judd D. Hoffman is CEO and co-founder of Ethica AI, with nearly three decades across title, real estate technology, and operations. He has held $2 billion in title P&L responsibility. He was previously President of First American Title and Chief Transformation Officer at Doma, and led Iron Title through its 2021 exit.

Podcast Clips

A video series from Ethica AI CEO Judd Hoffman. New episodes drop on LinkedIn.