Market InsightsJudd Walks #645 min readJuly 16, 2026

Teams Follow Behavior, Not Press Releases

Judd Hoffman
Judd Hoffman

CEO, Ethica AI

PwC's CEO said partners who do not embrace AI have no future at the firm. That is an extremely strong signal. AI adoption is no longer optional at the top of any of these firms. The real lesson here is not fear. It's responsibility. Leaders cannot just talk about AI. They have to learn it, use it, model it. Because teams do not follow press releases, they follow behavior and they follow their leaders.

Let me sit on this, because the headline everyone shared is the ultimatum, and the ultimatum is the least interesting part of the story.

Here's what was actually said. PwC's US CEO Paul Griggs told the Financial Times that partners who resist AI have no place at the firm. His exact words: "I don't think anyone gets a free pass here. Anyone." Employees who think they can opt out of AI, he said, are not going to be around long. And this isn't posturing attached to nothing. The firm is converting parts of its tax and consulting services into automated tools that clients can use, in his words, without a PwC person in the loop. The business model itself is being rebuilt, and he's telling the most senior people in the building that they either rebuild with it or get replaced by people who will.

Now, when the leader of one of the largest professional services firms on the planet says that out loud, in public, on the record, that is not a hot take. That is a signal. Firms like that do not speak that way for attention. He said it because it's already the operating reality inside the building, and saying it publicly commits the whole partnership to it. AI adoption is no longer optional at the top. Not at his firm, and increasingly not at any firm of consequence.

But here's where I want to take this somewhere the headlines didn't.

The easy reading of that story is fear. Adopt or be replaced. Get on the train or get left at the station. And look, the fear reading isn't wrong exactly, it's real, and anyone who has read what's happening across these firms feels a version of it. But fear is a useless takeaway. Fear doesn't tell anyone what to do on Monday morning. The real lesson is not fear. It's responsibility. And the responsibility lands on the leaders.

Because think about what Griggs is actually doing in that interview, separate from the threat. He's not delegating AI to a task force. He's not announcing a pilot program run by someone three levels down. He's personally, publicly staking his leadership on it. Agree or disagree with the ultimatum, the man is modeling the behavior he's demanding. And that, not the threat, is the part every leader should be studying.

Here's the thing I've learned watching companies try to adopt AI, and honestly, watching myself lead through it. Teams do not follow press releases. They follow behavior. You can announce an AI initiative, put it in the all-hands deck, hire a consultant, send the memo. And your team will nod, and then they will watch you. They will watch whether you actually use the tools you're telling them to use. They will watch whether you reach for AI when a real problem shows up on your own desk, or whether you reach for the old way and quietly reveal that the initiative was for other people.

And whatever you do, that's what they'll do. Not what you said. What you did. Culture is downstream of the leader's actual behavior, every time, in every company, and AI adoption is no exception. A leader who talks about AI but doesn't use it is running an initiative that is already dead. The team can smell it. A leader who learns it badly, in public, who asks dumb questions and gets caught by the tool's limits and keeps going anyway, that leader gives everyone underneath them permission to do the same. And permission, it turns out, is the thing most teams are actually waiting for.

So the responsibility breaks into three words, and they're deliberately simple. Learn it. Not headlines about it. The actual tools, hands on, on your own work. Use it. Daily, on real tasks, where the team can see it, including the failures. Model it. Let people watch you work through it, because your visible practice is worth more than any mandate you could write.

That's what I'd take from the PwC story if I ran a team of any size in any industry. Not the fear of being replaced. The responsibility of going first. The leaders who go first give their teams a path. The leaders who only point never do.

Teams do not follow press releases. They follow behavior, and they follow their leaders. Go first.

*Judd Hoffman is CEO and Co-Founder of Ethica AI, building AI-powered tools for real estate transaction workflows.*

Quick Takes

What did PwC's CEO say about partners and AI?

PwC's US CEO Paul Griggs said in a Financial Times interview that partners who resist AI have no place at the firm, that no one gets a free pass, and that employees who believe they can opt out of AI will not remain at the firm long. PwC is simultaneously converting parts of its tax and consulting services into automated tools clients can use without a PwC person in the loop.

Is AI adoption mandatory at major firms now?

Increasingly, yes, at the leadership level. When the head of one of the largest professional services firms publicly ties partnership tenure to AI adoption, it signals that adoption has moved from encouraged to expected at the top of major firms, with the business model itself being rebuilt around the technology.

Why do AI initiatives fail inside companies?

Most often because leadership announces rather than models. Teams follow behavior, not press releases. When a leader talks about AI but visibly reaches for the old way on their own work, the team reads the initiative as optional and it quietly dies. Adoption spreads when leaders visibly learn and use the tools themselves, including their failures.

What should leaders do about AI adoption?

Three things. Learn it: hands-on use of the actual tools on their own work, not headlines about them. Use it: daily, on real tasks, visibly. Model it: let the team watch the practice, including the mistakes, because a leader's visible use grants the permission most teams are waiting for.

Should employees fear AI mandates like PwC's?

Fear is the least useful reading. The more practical takeaway is responsibility: leaders who go first give their teams a path to adopt well, while mandates without modeled behavior produce compliance rather than capability. Individuals who build a daily practice with AI tools position themselves ahead of any mandate.

Who is Judd Hoffman?

Judd Hoffman is CEO and Co-Founder of Ethica AI, a company building AI-powered voice tools for real estate transaction workflows, backed by the California Association of REALTORS. He has nearly three decades of operating experience, including more than 15 years across real estate title, transactions, and technology.

What is Ethica AI?

Ethica AI is a real estate technology company building VoicePilot, an AI-powered tool that allows real estate agents to complete transaction forms by speaking naturally instead of filling out PDFs manually. VoicePilot is backed by the California Association of REALTORS as a free member benefit for more than 190,000 members.

Full Transcript

PwC's CEO said partners who do not embrace AI have no future at the firm. That is an extremely strong signal. AI adoption is no longer optional at the top of any of these firms. The real lesson here is not fear, though its responsibility. Leaders cannot just talk about AI. They have to learn it, use it, model it. Because teams do not follow press releases, they follow behavior and they follow their leaders.

Judd Hoffman

Judd Walks

A video series from Ethica AI CEO Judd Hoffman. New episodes drop on LinkedIn.